ABSTRACT
Background Studies for developing diagnostics and treatments for infectious diseases usually require observing the onset of infection during the study period. However, when the infection base rate incidence is low, the cohort size required to measure an effect becomes large, and recruitment becomes costly and prolonged. We developed a model for reducing recruiting time and resources in a COVID-19 detection study by targeting recruitment to high-risk individuals. Methods We conducted an observational longitudinal cohort study at individual sites throughout the U.S., enrolling adults who were members of an online health and research platform. Through direct and longitudinal connection with research participants, we applied machine learning techniques to compute individual risk scores from individually permissioned data about socioeconomic and behavioral data, in combination with predicted local prevalence data. The modeled risk scores were then used to target candidates for enrollment in a hypothetical COVID-19 detection study. The main outcome measure was the incidence rate of COVID-19 according to the risk model compared with incidence rates in actual vaccine trials. Results When we used risk scores from 66,040 participants to recruit a balanced cohort of participants for a COVID-19 detection study, we obtained a 4- to 7-fold greater COVID-19 infection incidence rate compared with similar real-world study cohorts. Conclusion This risk model offers the possibility of reducing costs, increasing the power of analyses, and shortening study periods by targeting for recruitment participants at higher risk.
ABSTRACT
Background: Studies for developing diagnostics and treatments for infectious diseases usually require observing the onset of infection during the study period. However, when the infection base rate incidence is low, the cohort size required to measure an effect becomes large, and recruitment becomes costly and prolonged. We developed a model for reducing recruiting time and resources in a COVID-19 detection study by targeting recruitment to high-risk individuals. Methods: We conducted an observational longitudinal cohort study at individual sites throughout the U.S., enrolling adults who were members of an online health and research platform. Through direct and longitudinal connection with research participants, we applied machine learning techniques to compute individual risk scores from individually permissioned data about socioeconomic and behavioral data, in combination with predicted local prevalence data. The modeled risk scores were then used to target candidates for enrollment in a hypothetical COVID-19 detection study. The main outcome measure was the incidence rate of COVID-19 according to the risk model compared with incidence rates in actual vaccine trials. Results: When we used risk scores from 66,040 participants to recruit a balanced cohort of participants for a COVID-19 detection study, we obtained a 4- to 7-fold greater COVID-19 infection incidence rate compared with similar real-world study cohorts. Conclusion: This risk model offers the possibility of reducing costs, increasing the power of analyses, and shortening study periods by targeting for recruitment participants at higher risk.
ABSTRACT
Importance: The severity of viral infections can vary widely, from asymptomatic cases to complications leading to hospitalizations and death. Milder cases, despite being more prevalent, often go undocumented, and their public health burden is not accurately estimated. Objective: To estimate the true burden of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the US population using a surrogate measure of daily steps lost as measured by commercial wearable sensors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study modeled data from 15â¯122 US adults who reported ILI symptoms during the 2018-2019 influenza season (before the COVID-19 pandemic) and who had a sufficient density of wearable sensor data at symptom onset. Participants' minute-level step data as measured by commercial wearable sensors were collected from October 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Minute-level activity time series were transformed into day-level time series per user, indicating the total number of steps daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the number of steps lost during the period of 4 days before symptom onset (the latent phase) through 11 days after symptom onset (the symptomatic phase). The association between covariates and steps lost during this interval was also examined. Results: Of the 15â¯122 participants in this study, 13â¯108 (86.7%) were women, and the median age was 32 years (IQR, 27-38 years). For their ILI event, 2836 of 15â¯080 participants (18.8%) sought medical attention, and only 61 (0.4%) were hospitalized. Over the course of an ILI lasting 10 days, the mean cumulative loss was 4437 steps (95% CI, 4143-4731 steps). After weighting, there was an estimated overall nationwide reduction in mobility equivalent to 255.2 billion steps (95% CI, 232.9-277.6 billion steps) lost because of ILI symptoms during the study period. This finding reflects significant changes in routines, mobility, and employment and is equivalent to 15% of the active US population becoming completely immobilized for 1 day. Moreover, 60.6% of this reduction in steps (154.6 billion steps [95% CI, 138.1-171.2 billion steps]) occurred among persons who sought no medical care. Age and educational level were positively associated with steps lost. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that most of the burden of ILI in this study would have been invisible to health care and public health reporting systems. This approach has applications for public health, health care, and clinical research, from estimating costs of lost productivity at population scale, to measuring effectiveness of anti-ILI treatments, to monitoring recovery after acute viral syndromes such as during long COVID-19.